Donnerstag, 27. November 2014

THE HUNGER GAMES: MOCKINGJAY - PART 1 - Movie Review

Title: The Huger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
Running Time: 123 min
Director: Francis Lawrence
Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Julianne Moore, Elizabeth Banks, Sam Claflin, Jeffrey Wright, Philip Seymour Hoffman (†), Donald Sutherland, Natalie Dormer, Sarita Choudhury, Stanley Tucci, Willow Shields

Review:
Jennifer Lawrence has made a meteoric rise in just four years. Landing the role of Mystique in the popular "X-Men" franchise, as well as the lead role in the film adaptation of the young adult novel "The Hunger Games", she quickly became one of Hollywood's darlings and, because of her down-to-earth attitude, managed to get an enourmos fan-base. Critics seem to like her too, as she has been nominated for an Academy Award three times since 2010 and even won the Oscar Gold for Best Supporting Actress in 2013. So, with "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" Lawrence returns to the franchise that made her a worldwide phenomenon once more.
The emphasis in this title is really placed on the term "Part 1". The film builds up a lot of tension, but misses a climax, and thus, feels more like a bridge to "Mockingjay Part 2". Storywise, you get the impression that the "Hunger Games" franchise has matured, as its political themes are increasingly coming to the fore, which is cool to see. Focussing heavily on the way two opposing groups use propaganda in order to get people to join their cause, it is an interesting and relevant piece. As result, however, they cut back on the action, so if you are just in for the people-murdering-each-other aspect, you will be disappointed.
The actors all deliver extremely well. Josh Hutcherson manages to level up his performance, especially in the final act of the film, and the script allows Jennifer Lawrence to show a bit more range the other movies did. Dormer and Moore are great additions, and very fitting for their roles, as well as the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman who gets as close to comic relief as you can in a dystopian story.
Visually, the film's effect have improved as well, while the color palette is much less flashy than in "Catching Fire" to fit the overall tone. In general, the movie looks much smaller than its predecessors, since it has just a few settings and is slower paced. Nonetheless, because the characters (and with them the audience) are looking at the bigger picture, you can't help but feel that you are at the brink of something monumental.
In the end, although it could be argued wether it was good to split the third entry in two movies, "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1" is a worthy entry for the series. If you are a fan of the franchise, and maybe even read the books, it won't let you down. If, on the other hand, you are just a casual viewer, it won't be too bad if you catch it some time next year just before the finale comes out. Having read the books I can say: It is going to be of epic proportion!


For Fans Of:
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013)
The Hunger Games (2012)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

Dienstag, 25. November 2014

OUTSIDE HOLLYWOOD EP.6 - TV Shows, Nightcrawler, and more

 Hello there puny humans,
another fortnight has passed, so that means another Podcast is out! This time my buddy Björn from B.A.'s Screentest and I decided to talk about TV. Why do we have this "golden age of television"? What are some good shows? Which ones do we personally like?

Again we split this into two parts and in this one we give our thoughts on "Nightcrawler", as well as special casting news for Bond 24 and Captain America: Civil War and much more!

I hope you'll enjoy it and maybe start to watch some series that you might not have heard of before!

Your Cinemartian

Samstag, 22. November 2014

TRANSFORMERS vs. PACIFIC RIM - why they are NOT the same!

 Hello there puny humans,
today I want to talk to you about something that has been bugging me for quite some time. When I watched Pacific Rim I had an amazing time and it became one of my favourite films. Nevertheless, I understand that this is a movie that is targeted to a specific audience, so not everyone might enjoy it the way I did. What I can't accept, however, is the phrase: "Well, it's just the same shit as Transformers".
It isn't. Sure, it has giant robots/aliens fighting each other, but that is as big of a similarity as the one between the Spielberg-classic Jaws and the god-awful Shark Attack-franchise. So let me enlighten you with the following article, where I will examine a few elements of these films and highlight their differences:


1. The Right Direction
Granted, this is not the best argument, as almost every director has hits and misses, but just look at the filmmakers who conceived these projects: In one corner, there is Guillermo del Toro. A man, whom you will most likely associate with the dark fantasy drama Pan's Labyrinth, which was nominated for 6 Oscars and won 3. During his career del Toro himself has earned a total of 27 different film awards and has also published three novels that then spawned comic books and a TV series.
In the other corner is Michael Bay. A nine-time Golden Raspberry Nominee, who actually won the infamous award twice: Worst Director and Worst Film, both in 2009. Further, this guy's directing style has gotten its own nickname in Hollywood, "Bayhem", which is obviously a wordplay on  "mayhem", a term that literally means chaos or confusion. I mean, we are talking about the person that wanted to turn the Ninja Turtles into aliens...

2. Less Is More
Of course, these films are not intellectual cinema. They simply want to entertain in a spectacular fashion. Pacific Rim understands that. Sure, the whole two-pilots-for-a-jaeger thing was a tiny bit complicated, but otherwise the story is very simple and straightforward: Huge Aliens attack our cities, so we fight back with huge robots. There isn't much more to it. But exactly that is perfect, because we don't need more.
The Transformers movies on the other hand shoehorne too many unnecessary subplots and too much mythological non-sense into their story-line. With all that overflow, you'll need a few seconds to realize that at the end of the first movie, they defeat the bad guy by giving him "the cube", so the thing they tried to hide from him during the entire rest of the film. Ultimately, this means that if our "heroes" hadn't been there to "help", a whole city would have been saved from destruction... awesome! -_-
I won't even start to rant about the second film, which was such a clusterfuck that even its director admitted it in an interview with the Empire: "The real fault with [Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen] is that it ran into a mystical world. When I look back at it, that was crap."

3. Shooting Action - or: "What the fuck is happening?"
Now, as previously stated, the action is the one big thing both of these films really are about. But here too, the movies have little in common. I talked about Bayhem before and I am going to explain it further:
Action Scene from Transformers 2
 Michael Bay tries to make his shots as epic as possible, which is a commendable plan, but as always he goes too far over the top. Most of the time, his action sequences have multiple layers to achieve depth, and at least two of those layers contain objects that move in different directions to make the shot more dynamic. Additionally, the camera usually moves yet another way. If used correctly, this kind of technique can look awesome, as seen in the amazing tracking shot in The Avengers. Bay, however, does a few mistakes: Firstly, the different movements happen way too fast and often he edits his scenes with quick cuts. This makes the picture very agitated and restless. Secondly, he uses this style almost exclusively instead of highlighting certain events. As a result, it either becomes less special or even exhausting for the audience's eyes. On top of all that, Bay throws tons of explosions and flying debris in the mix, creating images that are extremly overcrowded, and especially when you are working with robots, it gets hard to tell where top or bottom is. If you want to find out more about Michael Bays convoluted style of directing I recommend Tony Zhou's youtube video on the matter.
Action Scene from Pacific Rim
Now, Pacific Rim on the other hand has a much more calm and epileptic-friendly way of creating awe-inspiring pictures. Instead of cramming a large number of things in the frame to demonstrate their variation in size, del Toro makes his creatures look big by using three certain techniques: The first one (and to be fair, Bay does this too) is using very low camera angles. By making the audience look far up at his creatures, they immediately appear to be humongous. Moreover, this effect is also achieved by showing only parts of their bodies in the frame, implying that they are simply to huge to be filmed in a full body shot, and leaving their actual size to the imagination of the viewer. Lastly, del Toro chooses the perfect settings for these fights. For example, knowing that the battle you are witnessing takes place in an ocean, but simultaneously seeing that the water is only knee-deep for these robots is, in all its simplicity, extremely powerful.

4. The Pieces of the Puzzle
 Now, we've checked "action" and "plot" off the list, and I admit that these might be the most crucial elements to determine the quality of this kind of film. Nonetheless, I am convinced there are a lot of other little things that can define a movie. So, I'll use this abstract to mention some of those:
The aliens in Pacific Rim are called "Kaijūs", which is japanese for giant monster, but the kaijū-film is even its own genre with Godzilla as its most famous representative. Guillermo del Toro pays great homage to that. For instance, his Kaijūs' acid spit is clearly inspired by Godzilla's famous atomic breath. The only thing Michael Bay pays tribute to is either himself (by shamelessly re-using footage of his older films) or commercial brands. But he doesn't only stuff his movies with a ridiculous amount of product placement. On average, the fourth Transformers film has an American flag on screen every three and a half minutes, and of course our friends from the U.S. Army are never far either. Pacific Rim is free of such an over-patriotism. In fact, its storyline has the whole world teaming up, with the biggest players next to the U.S. being Japan, Russia and Australia. Further, the commanding officer is British, and the scientists are German. Admittedly, the movie does stereotype these nations to an extent (think of the Russian's stone-cold faces), but at least it doesn't go full-on racist like Bay, who makes the only two dumb illiterate robots speak with a mexican accent.
If we talk about racism, we have to address sexism as well. It is very easy to see that Bay chooses his "actresses" based on looks rather than talent. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy seeing attractive women as much as the next guy, but I see no reason why female characters can't be beautiful and relevant to the story at the same time. Just recently, Edge of Tomorrow had exactly that in Emily Blunt's Rita Vrataski, the most beautiful of bad-asses. But Pacific Rim has some tough chicks of its own, with the fearless russian and, of course, the highly skilled Mako Mori. They might be the only two female roles in the film, but in this particular movie feud I will count the absence of a negative (like Bay constantly writing strippers into his scripts) as a positve.

5. Listen to Others
If I really haven't convinced you yet, maybe some solid statistics are due: The website Rotten Tomatoes collects online reviews from writers who are certified members of various writing guilds or film critic associations. On this site, Pacific Rim scored a 72% rating, while the Transformers films are at an average of 32.5% (the highest score being 57% for the first one, and the lowest score for the second part with an 18%).

6. Conclusion
At this point, you might have noticed that I am not too fond of the Transformers movies and the director behind them. It's true that I could easily go on talking about the qualities of the actors or the time and effort put into sequels, but in the end I only want you to take away this:
In times like these, where it seems like a new blockbuster is produced every day, we shouldn't forget what good and what bad film making is. Aside from our personal preference of a specific topic, we must judge a movie by looking at what it is trying to be, and wether it used skill or cheap tricks to achieve that. As we are showered with countless films, it is tempting to categorize very broadly, but often that doesn't do a movie justice. Because even seemingly mindless films about giant ass-kicking robots can be very different in quality!

I hope you guys enjoyed this article and had as much fun reading it as I had writing it. For those who want to know more fun or interesting stuff about the two films, I've put together a TRANSFORMERS vs. PACIFIC RIM playlist on youtube. Let me know if you want me to do more articles like this and what your own thoughts about those movies are. So feel free to comment below!

Sincerely,
Your Cinemartian!

"I am first and foremost a movie geek." - del Toro
"I am, like, a true American!" - Bay


Sonntag, 16. November 2014

NIGHTCRAWLER - Movie Review

Title: Nightcrawler
Running Time: 117 min
Director: Dan Gilroy
Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Rene Russo, Riz Ahmed, Bill Paxton

Review:
When Tobey Maguire injured his back just before filming "Spiderman 2", they had already tailored a spidey-suit to Jake Gyllenhaal, just before Maguire surprisingly recovered. Two years later, Gyllenhaal auditioned for the title role in "Superman Returns", but was turned down as the studio wanted an 'unknown face'. Being Batman didn't work out either, and the part went to Christian Bale. However, after memorable performances in critically acclaimed films like "Brokeback Mountain", "Zodiac" and most recently "End of Watch", "Prisoners" and "Enemy", you could argue that, albeit he never got to be a super-hero, he has turned into a super-actor. And "Nightcrawler" is a perfect example for that!
Following the character of Lou Bloom, we witness how he starts a business in a shady but not uncommon area of journalism: independent filmcrews trying to be the first ones at crime scenes to film the events and sell the footage to news stations. A job that Lou gets disturbingly good at.
Gyllenhaal gives an exceptional performance here, and completely disappears into the role of this success-seeking sociopath (try saying that three times in a row). Since he appears in every single scene, the whole film really relies on his acting chops, but he delivers perfectly. From the first minute on you realize that there is something off with this guy, and the fact that the writers didn't give him any kind of backstory makes this character seem so much more unpredictable. But the movie doesn't only present a despicable human being to us, it also shows how such a person can still find success in today's perverted media.
A lot of the film takes place on the streets and in cars, and after „Drive“ the city of Los Angeles proves once more that it is the perfect setting for such a movie. Paired with the beautiful direction of Dan Gilroy,  it creates a special kind of atmosphere, and in general, Gilroy surprises with this debut. Through the camera, he manages to put you in a character's shoes, but keeps it so subtle that you won't even notice it.
Overall, "Nightcrawler" is a compelling thriller that is worth watching for Gyllenhaal alone. As its characters cross lines and subvert morality, you will be creeped out and fascinated at the same time.

For Fans Of:
Taxi Driver (1976)
Drive (2011)
The Social Network (2010)
Falling Down (1993)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion!

Mittwoch, 12. November 2014

OUTSIDE HOLLYWOOD EP.5 - Marvel vs. DC, Interstellar, etc.

 Hello there puny humans,
my friend from B.A.'s Screentest and I have recorded another podcast, and this time we changed up the format a bit. Now we have two thirty-minute parts with different topics: The first one is our big discussion about the movie battle between the comic book companies Marvel and DC. Who has the upper hand? Which of these upcoming superhero-movies are we excited for?



The second part is the review part, where we talk about the movies we watched recently (including "The Judge", "No Good Deed",  and of course "Interstellar"!), movies we recommend watching and the most recent movie news (Star Wars!!). So listen here:


Hopefully, you will have some good fun with these audible segments of our blogs and we will keep you interested!

Your Cinemartian 

Montag, 10. November 2014

INTERSTELLAR - Movie Review

 Title: Interstellar
Running Time: 169 min
Director: Christopher Nolan
Starring: Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Sir Michael Caine, Jessica Chastain, Mackenzie Foy, Wes Bentley, David Gyasi, John Lithgow, Casey Affleck, Topher Grace

Review:
When "The Dark Knight Rises" is the worst movie you've ever made, you are pretty god damn good. Yes, even outside of his game-changing Batman Trilogy, Christopher Nolan gave us brilliantly twisted and intelligent films like "Memento", "The Prestige" and of course the modern day masterpiece "Inception". By now, you have probably noticed that he is my personal favourite when it comes to film-makers. Thus, I was waiting for his new original project "Interstellar" like a child for Christmas, and now, it is finally here. So did he manage to blow my mind again?
Yes. Yes he did. Big time! Leaving me speechless for the whole ride home from the theatre, "Interstellar" wasn't a movie to me, it was an experience. It is a true science-fiction film, that revolves around a man, who leaves his family and the dying earth behind, to find a new inhabitable planet in a different galaxy. Nolan, knowing exactly when less is more and when more is more, astonishes us with breathtaking visuals and manages to make you feel like you are actually part of this amazing space adventure.
But not only the director is fantastic: While all of the actors are doing a great job, leading man Matthew McConaughey is outstanding. Proving that he really did deserve the Academy Award, he can move you to tears merely with his facial expressions. The relationship between his character and that character's daughter (portrayed by a suprisingly talented Mackenzie Foy) is the emotional core of this film and brings the humanity to this intergalactic story.
It should be mentioned, however, that a lot of elements I loved, might not be everyone's cup of tea. With their script, Chris Nolan and his brother Jonathan go full theoretical astrophysics on you. Including wormholes, blackholes, the relativity of time and even the fourth dimension in their story, they try to make you grasp the incomprehensible. So even though acclaimed physicist Kip Thorne wasn't only an advisor, but even executive producer on the film, these element that are based on real science might come across as far-fetched for the lesser versed viewer. Especially towards the end it seems like Christopher Nolan put everything his imagination had to offer in this film, with some philosophical questions in the mix as well. So what I found to be pure brilliance, might seem convoluted to others.
Still, "Interstellar" might be the greatest science-fiction movie I have ever laid my eyes upon. It is an incredible piece of art and will take you on an unforgettable ride. A film everyone should watch, for so many reasons, but also simply because its themes and contents can start a great discussion. So all that's left for me to say is: Buy your ticket now!


For Fans Of:
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
Apollo 13 (1995)
Moon (2009)
Gravity (2013)
 
Click Here To Watch Trailer!

And check out my friend's review over at B.A.'s Screentest for a second opinion! 

Mittwoch, 5. November 2014

THANK YOU FOR 2,000 HITS!!!

 Hello there puny humans,
or rather AMAZING humans! About a week ago, this blog has reached two-thousand pageviews, which in my opinion definetly needs some celebration. Hitting that mark after only 198 days means that there is an average of ten people that visit this website daily, which is really much more than I would have imagined. Like lots of my projects, this started as a fun little experiment, and seeing that it is so well received is a fantastic feeling!
Granted, some clicks come from myself as I spell-check and make sure everything new works properly, and there also is some weird russian server I got fifty visitors from... it looks kinda dubious. However, every now and then people tell me things like "Yeah, I always read your blog." or "That was a good film, I'd be interested to read your opinion on it." which means a whole lot to me. Knowing that people value my opinion, makes me feel valued as person, and writing these reviews has now become part of my everyday life.
It's tons of fun to watch movies, and since I run this blog I haven't only been going to the theaters more often, but I've been looking at the films more closely. Exploring a film in such a depth, helps me learn more about filmmaking itself as I try to find out why exactly I liked or disliked something. This is awesome and enhances every movie going experience.
So thank you for all your support and for giving me the chance to do this! You are the best! So here's a tiny little something I made for you:



Further, I wanna put some new things on this site: Currently I am working on a "Fun Stuff" and a "T-Shows" segment and I might write a few articles other than reviews. Hopefully you keep being interested, so I can keep talking about movies! So let's see what the next 2,000 views will bring...

With Graditude,
Your Cinemartian!

Sonntag, 2. November 2014

THE JUDGE - Movie Review

Title: The Judge
Running Time: 141 min
Director: David Dobkin
Satrring: Robert Downey Jr., Robert Duvall, Vera Farmiga, Billy Bob Thornton, Vincent D'Onofrio, Dax Shepard

Review:
When you think of Robert Downey Jr., you think of Iron Man. No wonder since he has slipped into that role four times during the past six years. But even though he has become a world-wide action hero, Downey junior is no stranger to drama. Next to works like "Restoration" or "The Soloist", he even earned an Oscar nomination for his portrayal of Charlie Chaplin in the 1992 biopic. So him starring in a drama about a cocky defense attorney, who must help his estranged father (the eponymous judge) as he gets in trouble with the law himself is not that suprising. What is suprising however, is that such a film is directed by a guy who is best known for helming movies like "Wedding Crashers", "Shanghai Knights" and the mediocre "The Change-Up".
"The Judge", however, works. It isn't just a story about father-son relationships, but about family in general, how you deal with your past and, in this regard, what you want for your future. But there is humor spread across this movie too, giving it a nice balance between light and sad moments. Duvall and Downey junior are excellent in their roles. With quite a few powerful scenes together, they really are the heart and soul of this film. Yet, the rest of the cast doesn't stand in their shadow as everyone does a great job.
Critics have accused this film of being clichéd, and it is true that it includes quite a lot of the typical drama elements. The problems seems like a bit too many to happen to one family, but because the characters are so well realized and fleshed out, they are still very relatable. This identification with its themes and topics is probably the movies biggest strength, and also the reason that you might notice its overlength but won't mind it. In addition, the courtroom scenes (although there are fewer than you'd expect from a film called "The Judge") always add to the films tension and manage to keep you invested.
All in all, it is a movie that tries hard, but also succeeds doing so. Full of funny and sad moments, it might make you reflect on your own life a bit, and ultimately leave you with a good feeling!

For Fans Of:
Up in the Air (2009)
The Place Beyond the Pines (2012)

Click Here To Watch Trailer!